Introduction

Contract interpretation principles vary significantly between common law and civil law systems, with important implications for international contracting. This article compares these approaches and their practical consequences.

Common Law Approach (England, US)

English Law: Objective Theory

English courts adopt a strictly objective approach to contract interpretation:

  • Textual Primacy: Interpretation based on what a reasonable person would understand from the language used
  • Contextual Evidence: Permitted but limited to background known to both parties
  • Parol Evidence Rule: Extrinsic evidence excluded for complete written contracts
  • Contra Proferentem: Ambiguities construed against drafter
  • Business Common Sense: Considered but cannot override clear language

US Approach: Textualism vs. Contextualism

US approach varies by jurisdiction:

  • New York: Textualist approach; strong parol evidence rule
  • Delaware: Textualist; will not consider extrinsic evidence if contract clear
  • California: Contextualist; broader use of extrinsic evidence
  • Restatement (Second): Permits extrinsic evidence to determine meaning

Civil Law Approach

French Law

Under reformed Civil Code (2016):

  • Article 1188: Interpretation based on common intent of parties
  • Good Faith: Duty to interpret in accordance with good faith
  • Usages and Practices: Considered in interpretation
  • Canon of Construction: Ambiguities construed against drafter

German Law

Under BGB:

  • §133: Actual intent interpretation (subjective)
  • §157: Good faith and customary practice interpretation
  • Objective Interpretation: For third-party protection

Practical Implications

  • Drafting Precision: Critical in common law; civil law allows more flexibility
  • Pre-contractual Negotiations: Generally inadmissible in common law; may be considered in civil law
  • Implied Terms: More readily implied in common law for business efficacy; civil law looks to statutory default rules
  • Good Faith: Fundamental principle in civil law; limited role in common law (except US good faith covenant)